July 12, 2026 · Megan Carter
E/M office visit levels: how coders pick between 99213 and 99214

Office visits are the most billed services in American medicine, and most of them land on one of two codes: 99213 or 99214. One level apart, a meaningful difference in payment, and a judgment call a coder makes dozens of times a day. Get it systematically wrong in one direction and the practice leaves money on the table; get it wrong in the other and the practice becomes an audit target. If CPT is the book coders live in, E/M leveling is the page they live on.
The 2021 rewrite: two paths, not three components
For decades, office visit levels were scored on three components: history, exam, and medical decision making. Coders counted bullet points in the chart note to justify a level, and providers wrote bloated notes to feed the count.
That system is gone for office visits. Since 2021, history and exam no longer determine the level; they just have to be medically appropriate. The level now comes from one of two paths, and the practice picks whichever fits the encounter better: medical decision making or total time. Every visit gets leveled on one or the other, never a blend.
That single fact sorts a lot of exam questions. An answer choice that justifies a level by the length of the history or the number of body systems examined is describing the old rules, and it's there to catch people who studied from an outdated source.
Path one: medical decision making
MDM is scored on three elements: the number and complexity of problems addressed, the amount and complexity of data reviewed and analyzed, and the risk of the management decisions. Each element gets rated, and the visit level is set by the best two out of three.
The four MDM levels map straight onto the codes: straightforward (99202/99212), low (99203/99213), moderate (99204/99214), and high (99205/99215).
The word that does the work is addressed. A stable, well-controlled chronic condition the provider actually evaluates and manages at the visit counts. A diagnosis that sits on the problem list untouched does not, no matter how serious it is. One stable chronic illness with a routine refill is a classic low-MDM visit: 99213. Two chronic conditions managed at the same visit, or one that's worsening and needs a medication change, pushes problems and risk to moderate: 99214. That contrast, in one form or another, is the most common E/M scenario the CPC throws at you.
Path two: total time
Time used to mean face-to-face time, and only when counseling dominated the visit. Now it means the provider's total time on the date of the encounter: reviewing the chart before walking in, the visit itself, ordering tests, documenting, calling the specialist that afternoon. What doesn't count is clinical staff time, travel, and anything billed separately.
Each code has a minimum that must be met:
| Established | Time | New | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 99212 | 10+ min | 99202 | 15+ min |
| 99213 | 20+ min | 99203 | 30+ min |
| 99214 | 30+ min | 99204 | 45+ min |
| 99215 | 40+ min | 99205 | 60+ min |
Two codes sit outside the pattern. 99211 has no time requirement and no MDM requirement; it's the minimal visit that doesn't require the physician, the classic nurse blood-pressure check. And past the top of the table, prolonged service add-on codes pick up where 99205 and 99215 stop.
On the exam, the trap is an answer that counts the medical assistant's intake time toward the total, or one that levels a visit by time using only the face-to-face minutes when the stem hands you documentation time too.
New or established: the three-year rule
Before any of this, the code family has to be right. A patient is new if no provider of the same specialty and subspecialty in the same group has seen them face-to-face in the past three years. Same group, same specialty, two years ago? Established, even if this particular physician has never met them. Different specialty in the same group? New. The CPC tests this rule constantly because it moves the answer across an entire code family before complexity even enters the picture.
Where E/M meets everything else
E/M codes don't live alone. The same visit that gets leveled also collides with same-day procedures, which is where modifier 25 earns its reputation, and a mislevel is one of the quieter reasons claims get denied or flagged for review.
Reading the rules is the easy half. The skill that passes the CPC, and the one the job actually runs on, is leveling visit after visit from realistic notes until the two-of-three logic is reflex. That's what practice exams are for, and it's the entire design of our study guide and exam simulator: 700 exam-style questions with the reasoning behind every answer, E/M leveling included.
Written by
Megan CarterMegan Carter writes the Brightwell Prep study guides for allied health certification exams. She writes the way she'd prepare someone for exam day: plain English, real exam-format practice, and a rationale for every single answer. Her guides come with the Brightwell Prep online exam simulator, so readers train under the same time pressure they'll face at the testing center.